Services
People
News and Events
Other
Blogs

Section 172 Road Traffic Act

  • Posted

Notice of Intended ProsecutionSection 172 Road Traffic Act


Section 172 Road Traffic Act

 

Receiving a section 172 notice through your letterbox can be confusing and intimidating to deal with. In the following article the specialist motoring solicitors at Parnell and Peel aim to inform you of your options and the information necessary in order to deal with the matter . For nearly 2 decades we have specialised in motoring offences with a long track record and an exemplary legal team contact us now for a free consultation to see where you stand in regards to your case .

 

What is section 172 of the Road Traffic Act

 

Section 172 of the Road Traffic Act states there is a duty on the registered keeper of a vehicle to provide information as to the identity of the driver as they may be required to give by or on behalf of a chief officer of police where the driver of a vehicle is alleged to be guilty of an offence under Road Traffic  Act. If the police are informed of a driving offence a section 172 notice will be sent to the address of the registered keeper of the vehicle failure to fulfil the request of information made by the officer may result in further penalties and consequences .

 

What offences can lead to a section 172 notice


Most motoring offences can lead to a section 172 notice some of the common ones we see are listed below :

  •  Speeding
  • Running a Red Light
  •  Careless or Dangerous Driving
  •  Driving Without Insurance
  • Driving Under the Influence
  •  Mobile Phone Use While Driving
  •  Driving Without a Valid Licence
  •  Driving Without Due Care and Attention
  • Leaving the Scene of an Accident

It is important to note that this is not an extensive list and other motoring offences may lead to a section 172 notice .

 

Section 172 Road Traffic Act

 

How to complete a section 172 notice


 

If you have received a section 172 notice as the registered keeper of a vehicle the process of completing the document is fairly straightforward the notice will ask for your details and questions in regards to the alleged offence committed . In order to avoid further penalties and consequences in the future it is advisable to complete the form with full transparency as failure to do so may result in an offence

Once the form has been completed you have 28 days to return the form to the police or you may be charged with failure to provide driver details

 

What to do if you do not know who was driving




 

If you don't know who was driving at the time of the offence for various reasons such as :

Having multiple drivers on your insurance policy

OR

 The alleged offence being committed prior to you purchasing the car

 You must state this within the section 172 notice providing false information in order to protect a friend may result in an offence of perverting the course of justice which can result in a higher severity of consequences and penalties . 

 

Penalties for failing to complete a section 172 notice correctly or within 28 days

 

 

If you have failed to complete the section 172 notice correctly or not completed it within 28 days you may be subject to the following penalties

  •  6 penalty points 
  •  Up to £1000 fine 
  • A disqualification from driving 

 

For more serious offences such as multiple offences committed and failure of the section 172 this could result in more severe consequences shown below :

 

Level Of Seriousness

Starting PointRangeDisqualificationPenalty Points 
Category 1 

High level community order

Low level community order – 26 weeks’ custody6 – 12 months9 – 10 points
Category 2 

Band C Fine

Band B fine – Medium level community orderUp to 6 months7 – 8 points
Category 3 Band B fineBand A fine – Band C fineNone 5 – 6 points

The penalties shown above are determined by the S172 magistrates sentencing guidelines and the range and severity of penalties imposed is under the discretion of the magistrates . As well as the nature of the offence other factors will also be taken into account such as mitigating and aggravating factors surrounding the offence .

 

Aggravating factors may include :

  • Previous Convictions 
  • Whether the offender was on bail at the time 
  • Little or no attempt made to comply with duty
  • Evidence of bad driving
  • Failure to comply with current court orders
  • Offence committed on licence or post sentence supervision

 

Mitigating factors may include : 

  •      No previous convictions or no relevant/recent convictions
  •      No previous convictions or no relevant/recent convictions
  •     Remorse
  •     Good character and/or exemplary conduct
  •     Reasonably believed identity known
  •    Genuine fear of retribution
  •    Significant attempt made to comply with duty
  •    Serious medical condition requiring urgent, intensive or long-term treatment
  •    Mental disorder or learning disability
  •    Age and/or lack of maturity
  •    Sole or primary carer for dependent relatives

 

Our Defences

 

 

When it comes to defending an offence of failing to provide driver details under section 172 we employ the use of 2 main defences :

  • Not reasonably practicable to provide details.

OR

  • Reasonable Diligence

 

Reasonable Diligence

 

 

“Reasonable Diligence ” refers to the care and attentiveness used by the motorist to ascertain who was driving at the time of the alleged offence

Section 172 of the RTA states that the registered keeper of the vehicle will not be guilty of the offence if the individual does not know who the driver was  and tried with due diligence to ascertain the identity of the driver but couldn't do so . There is no statutory definition on what constitutes reasonable diligence and therefore that decision is left in the hands of the magistrates .

The external factors surrounding the case will also be judged in order to decide whether the motorist has or hasn't tried to ascertain the identity of the driver to the best of their ability .  At Parnell and Peel we have put forward numerous successful reasonable diligence defences for our clients if you believe you have grounds to put forward a reasonable diligence defence contact us now at 0330 341 1690

 

Reasonably Practicable

The reasonably practicable defence applies where it was not reasonably practicable to provide details within the 28 days due to various reasons . This defence can apply in terms of postal issues of not receiving the notice or receiving the section 172 notice after the 28 days . As of recently postal strikes and delayed letters are common and if proven in front of the magistrates the reasonable practicable defence is extremely successful .

If you think you have grounds for a reasonable practicable defence get in touch now and speak to one of our specialist motoring solicitors to see where you stand in your case

 

Speak to a specialist

At Parnell and Peel we are a specialist motoring firm dealing solely with motoring offences for over 16 years . With an expert team of legal representatives and associates we can help you obtain the best possible outcome in your case . Contact us now at 0330 341 1690